This debate ( audio | video ) took place in 2003 at Hawaii U between Craig and Physicist Victor Stenger. The topic was "Is There a Good?"
4.25 stars. BEST
PhilVaz 5/5
CSA review: good
Ed the MSP review
Victor Stenger does better than most, he's a physicists and can better address the more sciency sounding arguments Craig throws out there than most. I further think he gave little ground and actually made a better (or more straightforward) quick* argument against the resurrection, especially since history is not his field.
But alas, Craig is just really good at having denser presentations and addressing a lot of information. Stenger's presentations just didn't come off as full of content as those of Dr. Craig.
Still, Stenger was pretty good in the Q&A portion of the debate as well. So I would rate this one up there with Dacey's first Craig debate, though Dacey was able to get a little more information out in his speeches compared to Stenger.
Stenger also debated Craig in 2010 and I want to listen to that one and review it soon!
A list of mini-reviews of Craig's debates can be found here!
*I say quick because there are better arguments that are put forth in other debates on that specific topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't be a jerk!